While the Samsung Galaxy S4 is currently top of the heap in the Android world, it’s worth noting that the previous incarnation – the S3 – is still available from most carriers, and at very impressive prices. The technology may be a over a year old, but that doesn’t mean it should be forgotten just because of the shiny things that have arrived since. There’s plenty of life yet in the old faithful, especially if you want a few more notes in your pocket at the end of each month.
Much has been made of the plastic construction on Samsung phones – although maybe that will be less discussed now that Apple has joined the polycarbonate revolution with the iPhone 5C – but I have to say that the S3 doesn’t feel cheap at all. In fact in the pebble blue colour that adorns this review unit the handset looked and felt just like metal for the most part. In many ways the construction argument is somewhat distorted, as most of us will put our expensive new handsets in a case almost immediately, and keep them there for the duration of our contracts. From that perspective all that really matters then is whether the screen looks good and the apps work quickly. On both counts the S3 is still a great phone.
The 4.8″ Super AMOLED display beams with colour and crisp images, showing off its 720p capabilities particularly well when viewing videos or reading news-feeds, where the text is sharp and clear. Navigating through the various home-screens on the Samsung Touchwiz interface is snappy and responsive, with the older components still holding up strongly. In fact with the latest 4.3 Jelly Bean version of Android announced to be released for the S3 in November its conceivable that the device might actually get faster in the coming months. Now there’s something you don’t see in technology very often.
The S3 comes with two options for internal storage 16 or 32GB, but Samsung is one of the last holdouts in the Micro-SD card slot stakes, with one included on the S3 that can add up to a further 64GB of storage to your handset by the simple addition of a card. That means you can keep all your music on your device without ever having to worry about it affecting performance or requiring careful management of which apps you keep installed. This is a good thing, especially if you don’t have access to unlimited internet connections that allow you to stream your media.
One area where Android phones often fall down with alarming regularity is in the camera department. The S3 though, dodges this particular bullet thanks to a very decent 8MP shooter that produces pleasing, colourful, and detailed results. Here’s a few examples of images I was able to capture while out and about with the S3.
If I was being picky then I’d have to say that the button arrangement on the S3, and therefore on the S4, lacks the comfortable user friendliness of the software keys on the Nexus 4, mainly due to the large physical home button that the Samsung devices use. Of course this has never hurt the iPhone, and for many an actual button will the preferable to a virtual one. Touchwiz is also a love it or loathe it kind of UI, and Judging by the hilarious amount of these units that have sold it’s pretty clear that many, many people love it. I’m just not really one of them. It’s not bad at all, but having seen the stock Android vision for the OS, it’s hard to go back to a proprietary version without feeling that you’ve lost something valuable. Of course these are minor gripes, and ones that I’m sure I would attune to if I used the S3 for a longer period of time.
In short, if you want a really solid, capable, top-tier phone then the S3 will do everything you want and at a price that will go down easier than most in these difficult times. Yes it’s the older model, yes it doesn’t have as many whizz-bang features as the new S4 or come in gold like the iPhone 5S, but at the end of the day it will still have some battery life left after you’ve listened to your music collection, taken some great photographs, wandered the halls of Youtube, and maybe even made the occasional call or two. Now that to me is what technology is all about.
By now most of us have seen the strange glory that is Kickstarter. Initially started back in 2009 to help impoverished creative types generate crowd-sourced money to fund their project, the site has now grown into something of a phenomena. The high profile success of projects such as the Pebble Watch, Ouya game system, and even the possible upcoming Veronica Mars movie, has caught the media’s attention and paved the way for a spectacular new project launched by comedian Jon Lajoie this week.
The idea is maddeningly simple. He wants to raise $500,000,000 so that he can be super rich. Boom, there it is. So elegant, so uncomplicated, so beautiful – it’s like the anti-Avril Lavigne.
‘Please help me accomplish my dream of becoming super-rich, without having to compromise my sense of entitlement’ Lajoie bravely opines in the video that accompanies his campaign.
‘By you simply handing over your hard earned money to me, I could become super rich without all the added pressure of actually doing something’ reasoned the comic with impeccable logic.
With so many great causes in the world that can tear at your heartstrings and leave you with a sense of overwhelming helplessness due to enormous needs that torture humanity, at least here you know you can make a difference…
No doubt employers see it as a menace against productivity, whose Siren-like beguilements carry their employees off to the harsh rocks of distraction. Teenagers deem the site a free portal to the latest music and Annoying Orange episodes, while to the more practically minded it is a wealth of instructional videos that cover everything from wiring a plug to building a home made spacecraft.
No kidding. Look it up.
From a novelty time-waster a few years ago the site has moved very much into the mainstream, with over four billion hours of content watched on the site each month. Four billion! That’s an impressive amount of amusing cat videos and Korean men riding invisible horses. In fact each minute of the day 72 hours of video are uploaded to the servers at YouTube, which will probably result in a new form of quantum maths being invented just to explain this quirk in the fabric of the time/space continuum.
The one thing that stands out to me among the multitude of shaky camera work, dubious presenting skills, and always heart-warming comment sections, is that people, on the whole, still just want to tell each other stories. Of course there will be those that like the idea of a certain level of internet fame, and even fewer still that achieve that great online dream of actually being paid for their work, but generally I think people want to share their experiences, thoughts, and in some cases ambitions, with anyone who will sit and listen.
Youtube has become the tribal campfire around which we tell our tales and listen in wonder to those of others.
We’ve seen instances where these stories are horrific, such as the Arab Spring footage that brought to the worlds’s attention the plight of Tunisians and Egyptians who were struggling against repressive governments. We’ve looked on in bewilderment as celebrities like Charlie Sheen have self destructed in a very public way (even with Tiger Blood coursing through his veins). But more often we have roared with laughter at sneezing pandas, cats playing pattycake, or people falling over while attempting some impressive feat of derring-do.
The site has also been the epicentre of memes that have spread into the wider culture, such as this summer’s Gangnam Style hysteria (which of course was damn good fun) and the current flash-mob craze that is Harlem Shake. Even 1980s flame haired pop minstrel Rick Astley saw his career briefly revived in the form of the ‘Rick Roll’, in which unsuspecting users would click on links to various interesting things only to find themselves redirected to a YouTube hosted video of Astley’s ‘Never Gonna Give You Up’. Inspired madness that only the internet could devise.
Those seeking wisdom can also mine the vast caverns of knowledge to extract the thought-ore they need. The Khan Academy alone has over 3,000 videos uploaded that can teach you advanced mathematics, the intricacies of high finance, or even a potted history of Vitamin C.
In essence…all life is here, and it’s available for free to anyone.
Interestingly in the last couple of years I’ve noticed an increasing trend that subtly alters the once distant way in which we interact with the site. Traditionally must-see clips would appear on the timelines of Facebook, Twitter, or any other social media of choice. We would click away then comment afterwards – social interaction completed. But with that advent of iPads, Smartphones, and Smart TVs, it seems that we’re beginning to share our favourite clips in a far more physical fashion – by actually sitting next to one another. On several occasions recently when people have come around to visit our home, the conversation would arise of a YouTube video someone has seen that either amused or challenged them in some way. From there it would only a short step to the ‘have you seen this one?’ question, and soon the evening morphs into a game of pass the controller as we frantically rush to find clips. It’s a particularly interesting game to play with people from other countries, who will usually bring with them links you’ve never come across before. Of course in the interests of international relations these cultural ambassadors then return home with new ones from your own personal archive.
In many ways it’s a modern equivalent of looking at someone’s CD or DVD collection, although this time you get to bring yours along too.
There’s actually no way to keep up with the incredible amount of content that goes live on the site every minute, and of course there’s a lot of chaff to sort through before you reach any wheat. With a few friends along for the ride though, we can all help each other find the good stuff, and maybe have a few laughs along the way.
Now, if we can just devise a way to toast marshmallows at the same time…
What’s your favourite YouTube clip? Post a link in the comments below and help us all find some fuel for our campfire.
Over the past two years around ninety people – some as young as sixteen years old – have been arrested in the US, UK, and mainland Europe for online criminal activities relating to the hacktivist group Anonymous. The charges they face range from disabling commercial websites, stealing sensitive information such as credit card details, to attacking government security sites. In March 2012 one of the leaders of the spin-off group called Lulzsec was arrested and has subsequently become an informant for the FBI in exchange for leniency, which has led to more arrests. It marks a significant moment in the fight against these new breed of activists, but the story behind them isn’t a simple case of young, technologically skilled kids with malicious intent. Some of them have a cause.
Ever since the dawn of computers there have been hackers. In fact many of the advances in technology and the internet have come from people who wanted to take something apart to understand how it worked, or use technology in ways that its creators never intended. Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook all were birthed in environments such as these, with Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak famous for selling little blue boxes that hacked the US telephone system and allowed their customers to make long distance calls for free.
There are also those who use these skills to make people’s life a misery, steal information, or generally wreak havoc. These are the reason we have firewalls, virus scanners and emails from Nigerian princes who want to give you a million pounds if you’ll just hand over your bank details. Somewhere between these extremes is another class of hacker, whose motives are considered noble by some and criminal by others. They are the Hacktivists, a modern equivalent of the political protesters, who instead of picketing embassies or wielding banners outside corporate headquarters conduct their campaigns over the internet with arguably more profound results.
The origins of the term Hacktivist comes from, depending which reports you believe, a hacker collective amusingly named The Cult of the Dead Cow. The name joined the words Hacker and Activist together in 1996 to describe people who had a political agenda for their digital infiltrations. Of course the name didn’t create the movements involved – there were recorded politically motivated hacks as early as 1989 – but it did give a distinction from those who attacked websites for personal gain. The causes that the early Hacktivists pursued included nuclear disarmament, a mass attack on the Indonesian government to highlight the conditions in East Timor, a series of hacks championing those murdered in the Acteal Massacre in Mexico by a paramilitary death squad, plus the Guy Fawkes day attack on the UK Government in 1994 protesting about the proposed Criminal Justice Bill, which disabled the official website for a full week.
The common weapon of the hacktivist is a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack, which essentially bombards the target servers with thousands of page requests (similar to masses of people sitting on the site and continually pressing refresh) which overloads and crashes the site. The idea is likened to a virtual sit-in and seen as disruptive rather than destructive because the target sites aren’t damaged, no information is stolen, but the volume of requests causes them to shut down, thus preventing anyone from gaining access.
If there’s one group that has become more famous than any other then it has to be Anonymous, who first announced themselves to the world in 2008 via a Youtube video which declared war on the church of Scientology (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ). The motivation behind this sudden conflict related to an internal promotional video for the Church, starring Tom Cruise, which had been leaked onto the internet. The content was embarrassing for the organisation and their notoriously aggressive legal team immediately began issuing take-down orders to any site that hosted the video with threats of legal action if they didn’t comply. This struck at the very heart of issues that hackers at Anonymous held sacred – free speech and non-censorship. Their video response threatened to destroy Scientology ‘for the good of your followers, for the good of mankind’, marking the beginning of a sustained campaign of DDoS attacks, phone pranks, and eventually culminating with a call to arms for followers to take to the streets and picket Scientology offices around the world. This seemed a potentially embarrassing move for a secretive and disparate collective of hackers. So It came as a massive surprise then when the day arrived and over 10,000 people assembled in several major cities across the globe, many wearing the adopted mark of Anonymous – a Guy Fawkes mask similar to the one that appeared in the movie V for Vendetta. Hacktivism had left the murky realms of basements and bedrooms and come out onto the streets.
Anthropologist Gabriella Coleman recently stated in the excellent documentary ‘We are Legion – the Story of the Hacktivists’ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWP2WwLGbWc) that ‘Prior to Anonymous, critics of the Church still had to be very, very careful because of the aggressive lawsuits that were launched against academics, journalists, and other critics. I would say that era is over, and Anonymous more than any other sort of intervention is responsible for that change’.
2010 saw the political whistleblower site Wikileaks release confidential communication records between the US state department and various representatives overseas. The move was highly controversial and caused widespread condemnation from the US government. In response pressure was put on Amazon, PayPal, Visa and Mastercard to remove services from Wikileaks – effectively hiding the site, freezing assets, and preventing supporters from financially donating to the organisation. Anonymous saw this as an attempt to censor the truth, and for federal and corporate bodies to crush those that would question them. The hackers quickly launched an offensive and armed their various activists with a program called the Low Orbit Ion Cannon, which made it incredibly easy to execute DDoS attacks without the need for technical or coding ability. In no time at all the sites of Paypal, Visa, and Mastercard were shut down, causing the companies losses which Paypal recently claimed to be in the region of £3.5 million. After continued attacks PayPal released the funds that it had held back from Wikileaks, although it did not reactivate the account.
These levels of aggression, as well as their public nature, saw the FBI, Interpol and other law enforcement agencies double their efforts to hunt down members of the group. It also marked the appearance of another Hacktivist called the Jester, a self proclaimed ex-US military operative who had previously targeted anti-American sites such as those linked to the Taliban. Angered by what he/she regarded as Wikileaks ‘attempting to endanger the lives of our troops’ The Jester launched a series of Denial of Service attacks on the Wikileaks site and also crossed swords with Anonymous.
It was surprising then that in the midst of these turbulent days the movement had what many believe was its finest hour. After Wikileaks released the communiques the site was promptly blocked by the Tunisian government. Further investigation of events in the North African country revealed alleged incidences of censorship, Facebook hacking to alter anti-government statements and also track the identities of those speaking out against the leadership. Anonymous members, working with fellow hacktivist group Telecomix, took out several official sites, and provided Tunisians with tools to avoid detection while online. The Tunisian president Ben Ali also had his servers hacked by activists and the information sent to Wikileaks for them to display on their site. Finally the dictatorship toppled under the weight of online attack, social media broadcasts of the conditions, and powerful civil protest from the Tunisian people.
One Anonymous member who calls herself ‘Homocarnula’ said of the Tunisian uprising ‘There’s a video where they are thanking us for being involved, holding up a mask saying we were the only ones that stood by their side. For me it was awesome to hear that and feel the connection.’
This first chapter in the Arab Springs uprising gave courage to those in Egypt who were also fighting to remove their ensconced dictatorship. In retaliation the government forces tried to eliminate internet access for the whole nation so that the people would be prevented from using social media to organise themselves and bring attention of their plight to the world. Again Anonymous and Telecomix worked hard to ensure that the footage of protesters clashing with aggressive government forces in the streets reached audiences outside the country. They also created various dial-up web access points, taught Egyptians how to validate SSL keys and certificates to circumvent the imposed restrictions, and launched their own DDoS attacks on government websites. Google also showed their hacker roots when they added support to the Egyptians by creating the Speak2Tweet service which enabled them to call certain numbers and leave their stories, which were subsequently posted on Twitter. When President Mubarak eventually ceded power, those that had fought with the Egyptian people in the digital realms knew that although their role wasn’t pivotal in the overthrow, it was certainly significant.
Sadly these methods may be required again, as reports coming out of Syria at the end of November 2012, show that the failing government has adopted the same tactics of restricted internet access. Google and Twitter have already reactivated the Speak2Tweet service, only time will tell whether the hacktivists rejoin the fight.
One of the most impressive things about the exploits of Anonymous is that they were, and remain today, a leaderless collection of hackers and activists who come together in response to perceived injustices, then work for a time until the operation is over. They have no meet-ups, membership programs, or stated agenda. This is how they remain Anonymous. There is a bulletin-board style site at Anonnews.org where ideas for causes are posted, but that’s about as centralised as things become. This is the organisation’s strength, but it can also be a problem, as it means hackers can do things under the banner of Anonymous that might not seem quite as justifiable as the Arab Springs and Wikileaks campaigns. In 2008 a famous incident occurred were members who thought that Anonymous had grown too serious and lost it’s sense of fun decided to hack epilepsy forums and post animated giffs that flashed black and white and could induce seizures in sufferers visiting the site. There have also been factions within the group who have decided to follow a more destructive path.
In 2011 a splinter group of Anonymous called Lulzsec appeared and went on what they termed ‘50 Days of Lulz’ where they hacked a wide range of sites just for laughs. Targets included Sony (from whom they stole thousands of customer account details), several game companies, and porn site Pron.com from whom they stole account details which they subsequently made public. They also attacked the sites of government agencies such as the CIA, US Senate, NHS, and the Serious Organised Crime Agency, seemingly in a display of their technical abilities and to highlight the shortcomings in their target’s security. When the fifty days were over the group announced to the world that they had completed their objectives and would now disband. The attacks ceased, and as quickly as they had appeared, the destructive force of Lulzsec vanished. At least until Hector Xavier Monsegur was finally caught by the FBI and revealed as the notorious hacker ‘Sabu’, a leader in the organisation. His evidence led to the arrests of five other members of the group, which was rumoured to only have seven in total.
With Lulzsec now seemingly all but gone, and Anonymous being hunted down by the authorities, you might think that this sudden escalation in coordinated attacks would begin to decline. But Anonymous isn’t such an easy enemy to dispel, and the worldwide nature of their followers and activists means that for every one the police detain there could be a hundred others to take their place. The nature of protest is changing and a growing dissatisfaction with corporate control, coupled with our continued transition to an online existence means they will be a force to be reckoned with for some time to come. As they once said of themselves ‘We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.’
A version of this post originally appeared as part of a new series of features called News Viewpoint that I write for the PC Advisor website and also appears in the March 2013 issue of the print magazine – yes, I know that’s in the future, but the way magazines work is a mysterious form of sorcery. To see the original click HERE or pop out to your local newsagent and purchase the rather splendid magazine itself.